tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16750015.post5998285481184747733..comments2024-01-24T20:01:37.600-05:00Comments on slight paranoia: Deconstructing the CALEA hearingChristopher Soghoianhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08950937382104783909noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16750015.post-56011691554716067212011-02-27T03:33:47.477-05:002011-02-27T03:33:47.477-05:00I'm actually guessing that the FBI would rathe...I'm actually guessing that the FBI would rather not step on any toes in the cloud computing world because it would clue criminals into the fact that they are publishing everything, either publicly and directly into FBI hands, or to cloud sites that are not in your home and don't need a knock-down-the-door raid to have their info examined.Averyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03097443949826910958noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16750015.post-50703972678799895202011-02-25T14:46:19.187-05:002011-02-25T14:46:19.187-05:00Avery, 30 years ago it was known as Reasonable Sus...Avery, 30 years ago it was known as Reasonable Suspicion. There was an expectation the FBI would have to provide evidence to the judge prior to his issuing a warrant for searches of any kind. Today, if they actually use a judge. the FBI can obtain a warrant, then force all parties privy to it's existence to remain silent. Additionally, the FBI fishes like a trawler on the Atlantic, using a net to capture everything in it's range. Then searches the net for suspicious content. This causes ALL user data to be subject to their collection techniques and makes every American a suspect. The concept is repulsing.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16750015.post-60269899270855095002011-02-22T12:44:16.631-05:002011-02-22T12:44:16.631-05:00Not sure you have the law quite right on this poin...Not sure you have the law quite right on this point: "Google, Microsoft, Facebook and Twitter are all legally required to provide after-the-fact access to their customers' stored data, in response to a valid legal process. The law does not require them to provide real-time interception capabilities. What this means is that while the government can go to Google and ask for all searches conducted by a particular user, they can't ask for all future searches or Google Chat instant message communications." Can't Title III or FISA orders for RT surveillance be served on anybody? CALEA is about meeting certain technical standards, not about the basic legal obligation to comply with court orders.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16750015.post-89975703261184389092011-02-22T01:07:47.440-05:002011-02-22T01:07:47.440-05:00FBI's job 30 years ago: figure out where the p...FBI's job 30 years ago: figure out where the phone line is, get warrant, listen to it constantly for quite some time, combine with photos and other complex evidence<br /><br />FBI's job now: do some google searches and pull a few gigs of data off of gmail with a warrant<br /><br />I kind of want that job.Averyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03097443949826910958noreply@blogger.com