This post should probably be called
Indiana Public Records Act Fun - but that doesn't quite roll off the tongue.
I signed up for an Indiana University email account in March or so of 2006. Between signing up and the start of school in September, I'd never used the email address for anything, and a Google query at the time for the address came back negative.
In mid June of 2006, I received a phishing email claiming to be from the IU credit union. The Indiana Daily Student later
covered this incident. The article merely mentioned that phishing emails targetting the credit union had been sent out, and that a bunch of students had typed in their info. The article didn't explain how the phishers had learned the email addresses of the students, nor who had launched the attack.
My IU email address is 'csoghoia'. Given that my email address was new, and wasn't published anywhere on the Internet, there was no way for a phisher to learn my address short of an exhaustive address space search (i.e. trying every possible combination of letters) - Unless, of course, the university was hacked, and information was stolen, or, if the university accidentally released my info. Either of these two potential scenarios were alarming, and so I began to look into the matter.
An email requesting information from IU's Incident Response Manager about how phishers had learned my email address resulted in this: "Unfortunately, I cannot comment on this activity as it relates to an active investigation. Be assured we are working aggressively to put a stop to it."
Alarm bells went off... Something phishy (ha ha) was going on.
Thus, on June 23 2006, I filed a
Indiana Public Records Act Request with the University. I asked for:
any and all information regarding theft or accidental loss of student data including but not limited to names, social security numbers, and email addresses. I am additionally requesting any and all information regarding any ongoing or completed investigations including those by the Office of the VP for Information Technology, of "phishing" emails sent to IU users pretending to be from the IU Credit Union. The scope for these two requests are for documents created within the last 6 months.On January 11 2007, I received a fat envelope full of papers from the Office of the University Counsel. The response can be seen
here. Most of the information was fairly boring, but there were some gems. I've scanned the interesting documents and put them online
here.
Typically, when phishers send emails out - they will collect an email list of millions of email addresses, and then send the same email out to them. Thus, in an effort to get the most bang for their phishing buck, the fraudsters target major banks. The idea being, of course, that out of 5 million email addresses, perhaps 200,000 actually belong to Citibank customers. Thus, it doesn't make too much sense for a phisher to send out 5 million emails claiming to be from a small credit union in Bloomington, Indiana. It simply isn't worth it.
If the phisher can get his hands on an email list of every person in Bloomington, then sending an email to every one of those people on the off-chance that they have a bank account with one of the major credit unions in town starts to make sense. This kind of targeted phishing attack has a name:
spear phishing.
And what happened in June 2006, was a case of spear phishing.
From reading the
documents that I've placed online, I've been able to figure out the following:
Chinese hackers - or at least, someone connecting from a machine in China, broke into one of the accounts on the 'steel' research cluster at IU. This cluster serves the research needs of the student population, and the
"about steel" page says that it has over 24,000 accounts active. It seems that most students have accounts - I have one, and I don't recall ever requesting one. Presumeably, it happens as part of the general account setup process.
Ok, so the hackers were able to gain access to Steel. What next?
Every unix machine has an "/etc/passwd" file that lists information on every active user account on the system. Steel has one of these. I just logged into steel a few moments ago to test this, and as of April 15 2007, Steel has over 30,000 user accounts listed in /etc/passwd.
With access to steel, the hackers were able to download the /etc/passwd file, and thus get a list of many many active user accounts. Your steel account name is the same as your IU email address. Thus, the hackers were able to get 30,000 email addresses.
The phishers then sent a large number of fake emails, claiming to be from the IU credit union, to IU users, directly from the steel cluser- that is, the fake emails were sent from within the IU network. A recent
report indicates that between 70-80 users were duped by this attack. A subsequent attack happened in Feburary of 2007. It is more than likely that either the same phishers, or another gang using the same stolen email address list, caused this attack. We will probably continue to see attacks, every few months, using the same email list. Eventually, in 2-3 years, when most of the students on the list have graduated, will the list finally be useless. Thus, for the phishers, the capture of the email list is a gift that keeps on giving.
It's also worth noting that the very same phishers launched a
similar attack against a credit union in Florida. They left a bunch of forensic evidence behind on steel which proves the link between the two credit union attacks. Clearly, these guys have found a niche (breaking into machines, gathering info, and then targeting small credit unions and banks). My guess is that it's quite profitable.
Which brings me to the most important point of this blog-post: Notification.
Indiana has a
Breach Notification Law. However, it is very narrowly written to only kick in when the following information is lost:
- Sec. 3. (a) As used in this chapter, "personal information" means:
- (1) an individual's
- (A) first name and last name; or
- (B) first initial and last name; and
- (2) at least one (1) of the following data elements:
- (A) Social Security number.
- (B) Driver's license number or identification card number.
- (C) Account number, credit card number, debit card number, security code, access code, or password of an individual's financial account.
- (b) The term does not include the following:
- (1) The last four (4) digits of an individual's Social Security number.
- (2) Publicly available information that is lawfully made available to the public from records of a federal agency or local agency.
The act only went into force on June 30 2006 - which is sadly, a few weeks too late.
For the purposes of discussion, lets pretend that the law kicked in on Jan 1 2006. In such a scenario, the university would still not be required to tell any of their students that chinese phishers had access to their email addresses. Why?
Because an email address is not covered by the law. If the phishers had stolen SSN's, then the university would be required to notify the student body...
I want to make it perfectly clear that I am not criticizing the university. They followed the law, and acted in a perfectly legally manner. My criticism, is of the law, which is weak, and ineffective.
As a side note: if the university decided to track students by their full last name and all but the first letter of their full name (i.e. "hristopher Soghoian"), as the law is currently written, the university wouldn't be required to notify students if the school were hacked into, and the entire database of student records and SSN's were stolen. Obviously, tracking students in such a way would not be very practical, but it does demonstrate that the law is fairly narrow, and doesn't cover everything.
My goal in posting this isn't to heap criticism on the university staff. The staff here are overworked, underpaid, and do their jobs as best as they can. The problem here is the law. It is broken, and needs to be fixed. We should not depend on inquisitive graduate students filing Public Records Act requests to learn about these kinds of incidents. The law should be amended so that we're told when they happen.
If you surveyed the student body, and asked them: "If the university were hacked into, and criminals were able to learn your email address, which they could later use for phishing attacks, or even to sell to spammers - would you want to be told" - I'm guessing that a large number would answer yes. Admittedly, this is a fairly loaded question - but in any case...
(As a technical aside: As things currently stand, every one of the 30,000 users who has an account on the steel cluster can get a full list of student's email addresses. This should be fixed. Any evil student could quite easily download the list and then sell it to spammers.)
